Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling. (문서, 2006) [University of Maryland, College Park]
컨텐츠로 이동
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.

저자: TE Roberts 소속: Health Economics Facility, HSMC, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK. t.e.roberts@bham.ac.ukChlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) GroupS RobinsonP BartonS Bryan모든 저자
판/형식: 문서 문서 : 영어
출저:Sexually transmitted infections, 2006 Jun; 82(3): 193-200; discussion 201
  피어-리뷰:
다른 데이터베이스: Academic Search CompleteWorldCatWorldCat
요약:
OBJECTIVE: To review systematically and critically, evidence used to derive estimates of costs and cost effectiveness of chlamydia screening. METHODS: Systematic review. A search of 11 electronic bibliographic databases from the earliest date available to August 2004 using keywords including chlamydia, pelvic inflammatory disease, economic evaluation, and cost. We included studies of chlamydia screening in males  더 읽기…
이 항목의 온라인 사본 가지러 가는 중… 이 항목의 온라인 사본 가지러 가는 중…

도서관에서 사본 찾기

해당 항목에 대한 위치와 이용가능성을 보기 해당 항목에 대한 위치와 이용가능성을 보기

WorldCat

전세계 도서관에서 찾기
이 항목을 소유하고 있는 전세계 도서관

상세정보

문서 유형 문서
모든 저자 / 참여자: TE Roberts 소속: Health Economics Facility, HSMC, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK. t.e.roberts@bham.ac.uk; Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) Group; S Robinson; P Barton; S Bryan; N Low
ISSN:1368-4973
언어 메모: English
고유 식별자: 109565442
상:

초록:

OBJECTIVE: To review systematically and critically, evidence used to derive estimates of costs and cost effectiveness of chlamydia screening. METHODS: Systematic review. A search of 11 electronic bibliographic databases from the earliest date available to August 2004 using keywords including chlamydia, pelvic inflammatory disease, economic evaluation, and cost. We included studies of chlamydia screening in males and/or females over 14 years, including studies of diagnostic tests, contact tracing, and treatment as part of a screening programme. Outcomes included cases of chlamydia identified and major outcomes averted. We assessed methodological quality and the modelling approach used. RESULTS: Of 713 identified papers we included 57 formal economic evaluations and two cost studies. Most studies found chlamydia screening to be cost effective, partner notification to be an effective adjunct, and testing with nucleic acid amplification tests, and treatment with azithromycin to be cost effective. Methodological problems limited the validity of these findings: most studies used static models that are inappropriate for infectious diseases; restricted outcomes were used as a basis for policy recommendations; and high estimates of the probability of chlamydia associated complications might have overestimated cost effectiveness. Two high quality dynamic modelling studies found opportunistic screening to be cost effective but poor reporting or uncertainty about complication rates make interpretation difficult. CONCLUSION: The inappropriate use of static models to study interventions to prevent a communicable disease means that uncertainty remains about whether chlamydia screening programmes are cost effective or not. The results of this review can be used by health service managers in the allocation of resources, and health economists and other researchers who are considering further research in this area.
해당 항목에 대한 메모 불러오기 해당 항목에 대한 메모 불러오기

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰

태그

모든 사용자 태그 (2)

가장 인기있는 태그 보기 태그 리스트 | 태그 구름

요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.